![]() As a general rule, Hindus uphold themselves to a strict moral code, believing in such concepts as reincarnation and karma. Based on various practices and philosophies, it is more of a way of life than a religion in the traditional sense. Even though many link it to the early Indus Valley Civilization, it does not have a particular beginning, but instead has been founded over many years. Because of this high number, it is easily the most popular religion in the region, with roughly 79.8 percent of India’s total population self-identifying as Hindu.Įxperts have dated Hinduism as far back as 4,000 years. Any attempt to discuss inequality will be viewed as an infringement on political sovereignty but is domestic inequality solely a domestic issue if it hinders the effectiveness of aid?Īnd could there be a case for a new multilateralism based on putting resources from donors and new MICs together? Keep an eye out in 2011: the fact that the world's poor are increasingly found in MICs has the power to shake up the entire aid and development industry.Approximately 1.2 billion people in the world currently practice Hinduism, with 95 percent living in India. This entails some thinking on what ODA is for. More equitable countries reduce poverty faster, and stubborn asset, gender or identity inequality (ie caste systems) might begin to explain persistent poverty amid wealth in the new MICs. ![]() ![]() Second, the end of aid and the equity elephant: overseas development assistance (ODA) is becoming less important and equity more important. The new UN multidimensional poverty measure might be one alternative tool. In light of the above, how should global poverty reduction be done differently in 2011?įirst, the LIC/MIC binary: If the focus is poor people not poor countries then the LIC/MIC way of looking at the world needs a rethink. Even if they are removed from the equation, the share of the world's poor living in MICs has still tripled since 1990. And this isn't just about China and India. Indeed, roughly three-quarters of the world's poor now live in MICs – 960 million, or a new "bottom billion". As developing countries get wealthier and are reclassified, many are still characterised by persistently high levels of poverty. The news raises some pressing and difficult questions for aid and development policy. Yes, there are fewer poor countries but poverty remains high in terms of absolute numbers in the MICs. On the whole, this is a good news story, but with an underside. Pakistan or the Ivory Coast might have cause for concern in 2011, for example. On the other hand, given the lingering reverberations of the global economic crisis, there is also a risk that some countries might drop back under the threshold, slipping once again into low-income status. The country will join Senegal, Cameroon, Angola and Sudan, which are among the growing number of African MICs. Ghana, for example, looks set to graduate in 2011, particularly in light of its new GDP figures unveiled last month. Only 39 states are still considered to be low-income countries (LICs).Īs we enter 2011, it is likely that more will follow. Taken by themselves, not big news perhaps, but add to that 22 other countries which, since 2000, are no longer considered officially poor, then a quite profound global change is under way: in short, most of the world's poor no longer live in "poor" countries.Ĭhina was upgraded in 2001 (based on 1999 data) and India, Pakistan, Nigeria and Indonesia are among the other states that have become middle-income countries (MICs).
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |